Eclipse Atlas is the third iteration of Michael Zeiler’s solar eclipse map websites. First there was Eclipse-Maps.com, which launched in 2010; then came the Great American Eclipse website to cover the North American total and annular eclipses in 2017, 2023 and 2024. As with Zeiler’s past projects, it’s a collection of maps of historic, upcoming and future eclipses; he’s launched this new website “with the goals of expanding to a global scope, replacing his two prior websites over time, and to taking his work in eclipse cartography to new levels.” Press release.
It’s been a while since I last posted something about light-pollution maps, which are used by astronomers to determine the best places to observe the night sky. But a couple of online light-pollution maps came to my attention recently: the Light Pollution Map at lightpollutionmap.app and the Light Pollution Map at lightpollutionmap.info. They’re different services despite being similar in name and in function, though I’d give the edge to .app in user-friendliness; .info has more tools but is fiddlier. (The usual tech dichotomy.) Confusingly, .info, not .app, is the one with the iPhone/iPad app. Both rely on NASA VIIRS data and give Bortle scale measurements for a selected location, which is the main thing. [Maps Mania/MetaFilter]
Moon Lidar is a visualization of some six billion measurements from the LRO’s Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter produced by software consultancy Hobu. Details here. Pretty impressive, and pretty, but it’s more of a proof of concept than a useable tool: no labels, only an alphabetical list of features in the menu that you can zoom to. [Kottke]
For the 2017 solar eclipse, NASA published eclipse maps that took the irregular umbral shadow of the moon into account: the umbra is neither circular nor oval but irregular—more polygonal—thanks to the uneven topography and elevation of both the moon and the earth. Not accounting for that introduces errors into the map that could make the difference between observing a partial rather than a total eclipse. The process behind those more accurate eclipse maps, which involves computer processing of both lunar and terrestrial elevation models, has now been published in The Astrophysical Journal. [Bad Astronomy]
Dr Root and colleagues from TU Delft and Utrecht University used tiny deviations in the orbits of satellites to investigate the gravity field of Mars and find clues about the planet’s internal mass distribution. This data was fed into models that use new observations from NASA’s Insight mission on the thickness and flexibility of the martian crust, as well as the dynamics of the planet’s mantle and deep interior, to create a global density map of Mars.
The density map shows that the northern polar features are approximately 300-400 kg/m3 denser than their surroundings. However, the study also revealed new insights into the structures underlying the huge volcanic region of Tharsis Rise, which includes the colossal volcano, Olympus Mons.
A method to improve the accuracy of maps of the lunar surface was published last month in The Planetary Science Journal. Photoclinometry, also known as shape-from-shading, can dramatically improve the resolution of digital elevation models generated from Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter data, but it’s apparently rather labour-intensive. From the Brown University press release: “The scholars outline in the study how advanced computer algorithms can be used to automate much of the process and significantly heighten the resolution of the models. The new software gives lunar scientists the tools to create larger maps of the Moon’s surface that contain finer details at a much faster pace, the researchers say.” [Universe Today]
Looks like we’re not quite done with eclipse maps, especially the whimsical sort, and it’s not at all invalid for xckd to have (what is probably going to be) the last word on the subject (at least for a while), with this fictional map showing the fictional path of a fictional eclipse over a fictional landscape, with rueful descriptions of fictional places where trying to see the fictional eclipse will come to a bad end for the fictional observers. (And you thought it was bad you got clouds.)
CNN: “New map calculations have raised some concerns that the path of totality—where it’s possible to see the moon completely block out the sun—is slightly narrower than NASA calculated. That means some cities on the edge of the route that were expecting to experience a second or two of total darkness might be left out.” The calculations were done by John Irwin, whose revised map can be found here. This page has the technical details, while Jamie Carter explains the implications: if Irwin’s correct, we’re talking about a literal edge case of a few hundred metres. Go further into the path of totality!
Eclipses aren’t any fun if you travel to go see one and it’s cloudy. I’ve been debating with myself what to do about next month’s total solar eclipse: the path of totality is a couple hours’ drive away and therefore manageable, but from what I’ve gathered the odds of clear skies aren’t great. These odds are based not on weather forecasts—still too early for that—but on historical data. For example, NASA Earth Observatory’s map, above, shows the average of the past 20 years of cloud cover across North America’s eclipse track on the day of the eclipse (April 8). Want more detail? Like, a lot more? See this incredibly detailed analysis from Eclipsophile’s Jay Anderson; I believe he’s a former meteorologist, and boy does it show in this piece. See also this Weather Underground article from last January, plus coverage from CBC News.
Alejandro Polanco’s latest Kickstarter project, Astronomy Atlas 1899, does for 19th-century astronomy atlases what his previous Geography 1880 project did for school atlases of the era: create an anthology of the best maps, drawings and diagrams from the books available to him.
In my library, in addition to the collection of geographical atlases from the 18th to the 21st century, there is a whole series of old books on astronomy, and of all of them, the ones that attract me the most are those published between 1880 and 1930. This was a time when science was developing at an astonishing rate and astronomy was changing radically. […]
In total there are twelve astronomical atlases in this library, mostly Spanish, French and English, published between 1880 and the early 1930s. From these I have selected the most interesting engravings and drawings, arranged them chronologically and given details of the original source. I have also supplemented many of them with other engravings from the Biblioteca Nacional de España and similar sources.
Digital (€18), softcover (€45) and limited-edition hardcover (€90) versions will be produced.
Two upcoming solar eclipses in North America—the annular eclipse on October 14, and the total eclipse on April 8, 2024—are the subject of numerous eclipse maps that track the path of totality and its duration along that path.
The Eclipse Company has separate maps for this month’s annular eclipse and next April’s total eclipse: these maps include data for locations along the path, including time, duration, the sun’s altitude and chance of clouds based on historical weather data. [PetaPixel]
The last time I went looking for eclipse maps, back in 2017, there was a website called GreatAmericanEclipse.com, which was the most recent of the websites showcasing the eclipse maps of Michael Zeiler. It’s still very much a going concern, with maps covering North America, individual U.S. states, and detailed maps of the path itself. These are static maps rather than the above interactive maps, but there are a lot of them, and not just for this month’s annular and next year’s total eclipse: there’s a fair bit of historical (and future!) eclipse maps there too.
On the LEGO Ideas website, user-submitted projects that reach the 10,000-supporter level are evaluated by LEGO to determine whether it can become a shipping product. Which is to say that Marc Sloan’s 2,360-piece “The Moon: Earth’s Companion,” a Moon map poster rendered in LEGO, stands at least some chance of being something one could buy at some point. [Universe Today]
